Jamie takes a privacy-first approach to meeting notes. It runs on your own device without a bot joining the call, keeps data inside the EU, and deletes the audio once it has been transcribed. It is aimed at professionals who handle sensitive conversations. If you are looking for a Jamie alternative, you probably want something that works for a whole team: a shared library, a bot that joins automatically from a calendar, owned action items and the ability to play a moment back.
This comparison covers those differences and says where Jamie is the better choice.
Competitor details are taken from each company's public website as of October 2026 and change often. Check their site for the current position.
| Notepik | Jamie | |
|---|---|---|
| Capture | Visible bot joins Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams and Webex, a Chrome extension that records a browser tab with no bot, plus uploads of recordings you already have | No bot: runs on your device (Mac, Windows, iPhone) for online and in-person meetings |
| Main focus | Decisions and action items with an owner and a due date | Private, accurate notes from sensitive conversations |
| Audio | Playback from any transcript line, while the recording is retained | Audio deleted after transcription |
| Action items | AI suggests an owner from who spoke, a person confirms it | Notes and templates, with tasks in your own tools |
| Workspace | One shared library for the whole team by default | Team workspace and shared templates on the Team plan |
| Integrations | Slack, Asana, Trello, ClickUp, HubSpot, plus a read-only API and signed webhooks for Zapier, Make and n8n | Google Docs, Notion and OneNote, with Asana, Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive and API access on Pro and above |
| Languages | Interface in English, French and Arabic, meetings summarised in the language spoken | Notes and transcripts in 99+ languages |
| Data location | Subprocessors and regions listed on the privacy page | Storage and processing stay within the EEA, Switzerland and the UK |
| Plan structure | Priced per workspace, every feature on every paid plan | Free, Plus, Pro, Team and Enterprise tiers |
Jamie's pitch is trust. It runs on your device, so nobody sees a bot. It says audio is deleted after transcription, that data stays within the EEA, Switzerland and the UK, and that your data is not used to train models. It lists notes and transcripts in more than 99 languages, and aims at private equity, banking, M&A, law, consulting, healthcare and the public sector. If your constraint is "no bot, no stored audio, and EU data residency", Jamie is designed around precisely that.
A device-based recorder needs a person running it. With Notepik, you connect a Google or Microsoft calendar and the bot joins the meetings you choose, visible in the participant list under a name you set. If the person who usually takes notes is away, the meeting is still captured.
Because Jamie deletes audio after transcription, a disputed line cannot be played back. On Notepik, every transcript timestamp plays the recording from that moment, while the recording is retained, and every action item links to the transcript line it came from. The retention of live-call recordings is limited and described on the features page.
On Notepik every meeting lands in one workspace. Search runs across titles, summaries and every spoken line, comments and @mentions anchor to a moment in the transcript, tags organise the library, and four roles control access. An audit trail records who changed what.
Every meeting yields a summary, a list of decisions and action items with a suggested owner and a due date, the owner drawn from who spoke and confirmed by a person. Tasks go to Asana, Trello, ClickUp, Slack or HubSpot, and the read-only API and signed webhooks reach Zapier, Make and n8n.
Upload audio or video up to 2 GB, on every plan, and it is written up like a live call (the first 45 minutes on the free plan).
Notepik is priced per workspace, with every feature on every paid plan and hours and seats as the only difference between them. See the pricing page.
Still writing meeting notes by hand?
Notepik joins the call, writes the summary, and hands you the action items before you have closed the tab.
Compare Notepik pricingChoose Jamie if:
Notepik's bot is always visible, and its Chrome extension, which has no bot, records browser tabs only and asks you to confirm that you will tell everyone first. Its processing providers and their regions are listed on the privacy page, and it has not been through a SOC 2 or ISO 27001 audit, which the security page states plainly.
Privacy tools and team tools solve different problems, so be clear about which one you have:
Many firms end up with both: a device-based recorder for the most sensitive conversations, and a shared workspace for everything the team needs a record of.
Keep Jamie for the conversations that need to stay off any server, and use Notepik for team meetings where a shared, traceable record is the point. Try the free plan on one recurring meeting; no card is needed.
Partly. Live calls use a visible bot by default, and the Chrome extension records a browser tab with no bot. It is not a device-wide app like Jamie, so desktop call apps and in-person meetings are recorded elsewhere and uploaded instead.
Yes, from any transcript line, while the recording is retained.
No. Bot recordings are held by the recording provider for a limited period, and uploads are stored in a private bucket. If audio must never be stored, a device-based tool such as Jamie fits better.
Yes, for one person, with no card required. It covers the bot, uploads, the Chrome extension, transcripts and search; paid plans add teammates, integrations and everything else.
See how a shared, traceable write-up compares: start free with Notepik.
Try Notepik on your next meeting
Free to start, no card required. Connect a calendar or paste a link, and the summary is waiting when the call ends.
Granola is a personal, bot-free notepad that improves the notes you take yourself. Notepik is a shared team workspace with a visible bot, a no-bot Chrome extension and owned action items. Here is how to choose.
Hugo and Notepik both aim to improve meeting documentation. This comparison explores their features, focusing on AI-driven summaries, action items, and search.
When evaluating meeting intelligence tools like Avoma, understanding the differences between platforms is key. Notepik offers a distinct approach.