When evaluating AI meeting assistants, two names frequently appear: Fathom and Notepik. Both platforms aim to automate meeting transcription, summarization, and action item capture. However, they approach these core functions with different philosophies and feature sets, particularly for teams focused on productivity and knowledge sharing. This comparison will look at how Fathom AI notetaker and Notepik differ, helping you decide which best fits your organization's workflow.
At their heart, both Fathom and Notepik provide automated transcription of your meetings held on platforms like Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams. They listen in, record, and convert spoken words into text.
Fathom: Fathom offers real-time transcription and automatically generates summaries. A key feature is its ability to allow users to manually highlight key moments during a call, which can then be used to refine the AI-generated summary. It also provides a "clip" feature to easily share snippets of the meeting.
Notepik: Notepik also transcribes meetings automatically. Its AI pipeline processes the recording to produce a concise summary, identify key decisions, and extract action items. Notepik's approach focuses on generating these outputs directly from the AI analysis, with the ability to customize summary templates for different meeting types (e.g., sales calls, standups, user interviews). This means a sales call summary will be structured differently from a bug triage meeting summary.
Extracting actionable insights is crucial. Both tools attempt to identify who needs to do what.
Fathom: Fathom identifies action items and can assign them to participants. Users can also manually edit or add action items post-meeting.
Notepik: Notepik's AI specifically aims to identify action items and suggest owners based on the conversation context. These are then presented within the meeting notes, allowing for team members to comment and @mention each other directly on the item. This integrated collaboration feature is central to Notepik's design.
Beyond individual meetings, the ability to search across your entire meeting history is where AI notetakers truly add value.
Fathom: Fathom allows searching within transcripts. The effectiveness of this search depends on the accuracy of the transcription and the user's ability to recall keywords.
Notepik: Notepik offers a powerful cross-meeting search capability. Users can ask questions in natural language, and Notepik will surface answers with citations from relevant meetings. This "Ask" feature is designed to retrieve information buried across months or years of meeting data without requiring users to remember specific keywords or meeting dates.
How these tools fit into your existing team workflows is a critical consideration.
Fathom: Fathom supports collaboration by allowing users to share meeting recordings and transcripts. It integrates with tools like Salesforce, HubSpot, and Gong, pushing relevant data to those platforms.
Notepik: Notepik is built for team collaboration. Teammates can comment on specific parts of a meeting transcript or decisions, and @mention colleagues to draw their attention. Integrations are available for Slack, Asana, Trello, and ClickUp, allowing action items and key notes to be pushed directly into project management workflows. Notepik also allows sharing meetings with public links, which can include or exclude the full transcript, enabling external stakeholders to review without needing an account.
For many businesses, especially those handling sensitive information, security and compliance are paramount.
Still writing meeting notes by hand?
Notepik joins the call, writes the summary, and hands you the action items before you have closed the tab.
Compare Notepik pricingFathom: Fathom states that it encrypts data in transit and at rest. They mention compliance with GDPR and CCPA. However, Fathom does not offer a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA), nor do they currently hold SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications. They do not support SAML single sign-on or SCIM for enterprise authentication.
Notepik: Notepik also encrypts data in transit and at rest, and enforces workspace isolation at the database level. Recordings are explicitly not used to train models. Like Fathom, Notepik does not offer a HIPAA BAA, is not HIPAA compliant, and is not suitable for clinical or patient conversations. It also does not currently have SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certifications or third-party penetration tests. Authentication is via email/password or Google, without SAML SSO or SCIM. Neither platform is suitable for legally privileged conversations, HR grievances, or disciplinary hearings.
Understanding the cost structure is essential for budgeting.
Fathom: Fathom offers a free tier with limitations on recording hours per month. Paid plans are typically priced per user, per month, with higher tiers offering more features and recording capacity.
Notepik: Notepik uses a workspace-based pricing model, not per seat. This means the cost is for the entire team's usage within a workspace, rather than being tied to individual users. They offer a free tier with a set number of included hours, and paid plans scale based on included hours and the number of seats allowed within the workspace. This can be more cost-effective for larger teams where not every member needs to be a primary user of the AI features.
For global teams, multi-language support is a significant advantage.
Fathom: Fathom supports multiple languages for transcription and summarization.
Notepik: Notepik supports multiple languages, including Arabic and French, for its transcription and AI processing capabilities.
Choosing between Fathom AI notetaker and Notepik depends on your team's specific needs and priorities.
Consider Fathom if:
Consider Notepik if:
Both Fathom and Notepik represent significant advancements in meeting intelligence. By understanding their distinct strengths and weaknesses, particularly concerning search, collaboration, and pricing, teams can make an informed decision about which AI notetaker will best enhance their productivity and knowledge sharing.
A common use case is automating the creation of meeting minutes, summaries, and action items, freeing up participants to focus on the discussion rather than note-taking. This also ensures consistency and accuracy in capturing decisions and tasks.
Both Fathom and Notepik aim to improve transcription accuracy over time. While they can often handle specialized vocabulary, accuracy can vary depending on the complexity and distinctiveness of the terms used. Users can sometimes provide feedback or custom glossaries to improve recognition for specific industries or companies.
For standard internal team meetings, yes. However, neither Fathom nor Notepik are suitable for legally privileged conversations, HR grievances, or disciplinary hearings. For highly sensitive data, organizations should consult their legal and security teams to ensure any tool meets their specific requirements, especially concerning data privacy and compliance certifications like SOC 2 or HIPAA, which neither currently holds.
Try Notepik on your next meeting
Free to start, no card required. Connect a calendar or paste a link, and the summary is waiting when the call ends.
Comparing Otter.ai meeting notes with Notepik. Find out which AI meeting intelligence platform offers the best transcription, summarization, and action item tracking for your team.
Otter.ai and Notepik both offer AI-powered meeting notes. This comparison explores their features, pricing, and suitability for different professional workflows.
Hugo and Notepik both aim to improve meeting documentation. This comparison explores their features, focusing on AI-driven summaries, action items, and search.